Skip to main content
mySites.guru

Active Joomla Extension security alerts: SP Page Builder RCEJCE 2.9.99.10Fabrik 4.7.2Phoca Cart: unauth SQLiZOO: unauth RCE

Five Security Issues in JEM (Joomla Event Manager), and No Stable Fix Yet

Five Security Issues in JEM (Joomla Event Manager), and No Stable Fix Yet

JEM, the Joomla Event Manager, is a long-running events component for Joomla. During security research on the extensions our customers rely on, mySites.guru found several security issues in JEM and reported them privately to the developers and to the Joomla Security Strike Team. The Joomla project’s CVE Numbering Authority has assigned five CVE IDs.

The most serious of them lets an anonymous visitor, with no account at all, overwrite and publish a Joomla article. There is one catch that shapes everything below: the fixes exist so far only in a release candidate, not a stable release, so there is no finished version to update to yet. This post covers what was found, the CVE numbers, and what you can do right now.

TL;DR

  • mySites.guru found and privately reported multiple security issues in JEM (Joomla Event Manager), the com_jem component, confirmed against JEM 5
  • The most serious lets an anonymous visitor overwrite and publish a Joomla article with no login. Others allow a registered user to take over another user’s event or venue, a reflected cross-site scripting flaw in the PDF export link, and attendee data readable by any logged-in user
  • The Joomla CNA has assigned five CVE IDs: CVE-2026-77034, CVE-2026-77035, CVE-2026-77989, CVE-2026-77990 and CVE-2026-77991. The records were reserved but not yet published when this post went up
  • The fixes are in JEM 5.0.1, which at the time of writing exists only as a public release candidate, not a stable release. The newest stable version, 5.0.0, is affected
  • There is no stable fix to install yet. Apply the mitigations below, and update to JEM 5.0.1 the moment the stable release is available
  • mySites.guru flags every connected Joomla site running an affected version of JEM automatically

We reported these issues privately, as we always do. The reason this is public before a stable release exists is that the vendor pushed the corrected code to a public release candidate on GitHub, and once the fix is public the flaw is too. We are publishing now, with mitigations, so the site owners who depend on JEM hear it from us.

What was found

We confirmed four issues against JEM 5 and noted two more from reading the code. We are describing them at the level of what an attacker can do and how to limit it, not publishing working exploits.

An anonymous visitor can overwrite and publish an article. JEM has a front-end action that updates the Joomla content article linked to an event, and it performed no permission check before writing to that article, including setting it to published. A visitor with nothing more than an ordinary session could republish and overwrite an article, including one that was unpublished. This is the most serious of the set because it needs no account at all and it writes to core Joomla content.

A registered user can take over another user’s event or venue. The check that decides whether you may edit a record trusted values sent in the request rather than the values stored in the database. A logged-in user with permission to edit their own events could send another user’s record along with their own identifier and take the record over. This needs only a plain registered account on a site that lets members create events.

A reflected cross-site scripting flaw in the PDF export link. The export link copied the page’s request parameters into the page without escaping them, so a crafted link could inject markup that runs in the victim’s browser. Joomla’s standard text filtering does not stop this, because the injection does not need HTML tags.

Attendee data readable by any logged-in user. The attendee list only checked that a visitor was logged in, not that they were entitled to see that event’s attendees. Any registered user could read attendee names, usernames, registration dates and statuses for events they do not manage, including events that are not published.

Two further items we noted from the code but did not exploit: an authenticated back-end file write that did not restrict file types, and a stored cross-site scripting issue through unescaped category names. Both need an account with elevated permissions, so they rank below the four above.

The five CVEs

The Joomla project operates its own CVE Numbering Authority, and it has assigned five identifiers for these issues:

  • CVE-2026-77034
  • CVE-2026-77035
  • CVE-2026-77989
  • CVE-2026-77990
  • CVE-2026-77991

Assigning a CVE ID and publishing its public record are two different steps. At the time of writing the five records were reserved but not yet published, so there is nothing to link to on cve.org yet and no official CVSS scores or affected-range statements to quote. We will add the record links, scores and the per-CVE mapping to this post once they publish. Until then, treat every JEM version below 5.0.1 as affected.

What to do right now

There is no stable release to update to yet, so the immediate job is to reduce who can reach the affected features:

  1. Find your JEM sites. If you use mySites.guru, we have already flagged every connected site running an affected version of JEM, so you have the list. If not, check each site’s installed extensions for JEM and confirm the version.
  2. Restrict front-end editing. If your site lets members create or edit events and venues from the front end, limit that to trusted users, or turn it off until you can update. This closes the record-takeover route and the article-overwrite route on any site that had front-end submission enabled.
  3. Restrict the front-end attendees view to event managers rather than any logged-in user, so attendee lists are not readable by ordinary members.
  4. Watch for JEM 5.0.1 stable and update the moment it ships. The fixes are already written; they just need to be released as a stable version rather than a release candidate. We will update this post when that happens.

Do not put the release candidate straight onto a production site you care about. A release candidate is a test build, not a finished release. The safer path is the mitigations above now, then the stable 5.0.1 when it is out.

How mySites.guru handles this across many sites

If you manage more than a handful of Joomla sites, the hard part of a story like this is not the fix, it is finding every site that needs it before an attacker does. mySites.guru keeps a live inventory of every extension on every connected site and flags the ones running affected versions, so a vulnerability like this turns into a filtered list rather than an afternoon of logging into control panels. When JEM 5.0.1 stable ships, the same list tells you which sites still need the update.

A note on how this was disclosed

Why is a set of security issues public before there is a stable fix to install? Because the corrected code was pushed to a public release candidate on GitHub before a coordinated release. Once the fix is public, anyone can compare it against the current version and see what changed, which is the moment a private disclosure stops being private. The Joomla Security Strike Team, which assigned the CVE numbers, put it plainly to the vendor: the uncoordinated release candidate turned a responsible disclosure of security issues into a public matter.

We recently republished the Joomla project’s own guidance for extension developers handling a security report, twenty documented practices, and a couple of them are worth noting here. One is to keep the fix private until a coordinated stable release, rather than shipping it in a public release candidate. Another, point 17, is not to hide security fixes in vague language: the commits carrying these fixes are described with lines like “Improve frontend attendee access handling”, which give no sign that they are security fixes at all. None of this is a swipe at the JEM developers, who are volunteers and who engaged once the report reached them. It is why coordinated disclosure exists, and it is the same standard we hold every extension to.

Disclosure timeline

  • 21 August 2026: mySites.guru is asked to review JEM 5 and reports the confirmed issues the same day, privately, to the vendor and to the Joomla Security Strike Team.
  • 22 August 2026: the vendor announces the fixes in a 5.0.1 release candidate and asks for re-testing. The Joomla Security Strike Team assigns five CVE IDs and notes to the vendor that the uncoordinated release candidate has made the matter public. No stable 5.0.1 release exists at the time of writing.
  • mySites.guru adds JEM to its vulnerability checks so every connected site on an affected version is flagged, and publishes this post with mitigations.

We will update this post with the CVE record links, scores and the stable release version once they are available.

Further Reading

Frequently Asked Questions

What is affected?
JEM, the Joomla Event Manager component (element com_jem), by the JEM Community. We confirmed the issues against JEM 5. The fixes are in the 5.0.1 release, which at the time of writing exists only as a public release candidate on the vendor's GitHub, not as a stable download. Every JEM version below 5.0.1 should be treated as affected until a stable release is available.
What can an attacker actually do?
The most serious issue lets an anonymous visitor, with no login at all, overwrite and publish a Joomla content article. A registered member can take over another user's event or venue. A reflected cross-site scripting flaw in the PDF export link can run script in a visitor's browser. And any logged-in user can read attendee lists, including names, usernames and registration details, for events they do not manage. Two further issues need an elevated account: an arbitrary file write and a stored cross-site scripting flaw through category names.
Which CVEs cover this?
The Joomla project's CVE Numbering Authority has assigned five IDs: CVE-2026-77034, CVE-2026-77035, CVE-2026-77989, CVE-2026-77990 and CVE-2026-77991. Assigning an ID and publishing the public record are two separate steps, and at the time of writing the records were reserved but not yet published, so there is nothing to link to on cve.org yet. We will link them here once they publish.
Is there a fixed version I can install?
Not a stable one yet. The vendor has committed fixes to a public 5.0.1 release candidate (the 5.0.1-bugfixes branch on GitHub), but there is no 5.0.1 stable release at the time of writing. The newest stable version is 5.0.0, which is affected. Until 5.0.1 stable ships, the practical answer is mitigation, not an update. mySites.guru flags every connected JEM site so you know which ones to act on the moment a stable fix is released.
Do attackers need to log in?
For the most serious issue, no. One of the confirmed problems lets an anonymous visitor overwrite and publish a Joomla content article with no login. Others need only a plain registered account on a site that allows front-end event submission. One issue affects any logged-in user. The severity depends on how your site is configured, which is why the mitigations centre on restricting who can use JEM's front-end editing and attendee features.
How do I know which of my sites run JEM?
If you manage Joomla sites with mySites.guru, we already flag every connected site running an affected version of JEM automatically, so you get a list rather than checking each site by hand. If you do not use mySites.guru, search each site's installed extensions for JEM or Joomla Event Manager and check the version against 5.0.1.

What our users say

Kieron Gray
Kieron GrayThe West Wing
★★★★★

Lifesaver! The ability to delete hacked files, identify others and upgrade plugins is terrific. A total bargain. Thank you Phil!

Read more reviews
Klaus Brandt
Klaus Brandt
★★★★★

So I'm just two weeks (or so...) here at mySites.guru. What should I say? Perfect. Secure. Reliable. And damn fast! Thank you, Phil, you saved my customers and my soul! :-) Greetings from Germany!

Read more reviews

Read all 268 reviews →

Ready to Take Control?

Start with a free site audit. No credit card required.

Get Your Free Site Audit